Factions

Moderator: Solethria

User avatar
Solethria
Posts: 233

Re: Factions

Post by Solethria » Sun Apr 28, 2019 9:01 am

Felinosa wrote:
Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:55 am
I would separate the men in Rohan and Gondor as the first delivery, basic, easy and effective.

And Isengard need more heroes, the super uruk-hai and Saruman ye, but need Grima maybe
Currently for the first roadmap the standard bfme2 factions and Angmar from rotwk are planned. Isengard will get Ugluk as an additional hero :)
Forum Moderator

Leloux
Posts: 6

Re: Factions

Post by Leloux » Fri May 10, 2019 1:26 pm

I think we dont need loads of factions, it will be verrry hard to balance, and also I assume many people dont want our beloved RTS game to turn into a visual sh*t show by this way.

Just stick to four factions for good and bad side. Seperating MotW to Rohan and Gondor, adding Angmar like RotW will be enough in terms of diversity. People who want more can do it by creating mods for the game once it is realesed.

Jushan105
Posts: 1

Re: Factions

Post by Jushan105 » Thu May 16, 2019 5:08 am

Will there be any incorporation of the Northern Dunedain or Arnor as a faction? They are my personal favorites from a lore perspective, and I was wondering if they could be considered for an update down the line! A personal idealistic list of factions would probably look like this from my POV. They are listed in personal importance to create within each faction.

Men
  • Gondor
  • Rohan
  • Arnor
  • Dale
Elves
  • High Elves (Imladris/Mithlond)
  • Lothlorien + Mirkwood
Dwarves
  • Erebor
  • Khazad Dum
  • Ered Luin (Blue Mountains)
  • Orocarni
Orcs
  • Mordor
  • Isenguard
  • Moria
  • Gundabad
  • Goblintown

Evil Men

  • Rhun (Easterlings)
  • Harad
  • Umbar
  • Dunland

I have a decent understanding to how IMMENSE your workload is. And I am a huge fan of the project you guys have put yourselves up to. I am super hyped, even if you release only Isenguard, I would play the heck out of it. But I cant help but think more about the project, and start getting all Idealistic :D Best of luck!

User avatar
Mithrandir
Posts: 4

Re: Factions

Post by Mithrandir » Thu May 16, 2019 5:43 pm

Would there be any scenario and possibility for skirmish games to play with all good / all bad factions. I thought playing with both elves and dwarves or elves and men would be super fun :D

User avatar
Lostir
Posts: 147

Re: Factions

Post by Lostir » Fri May 17, 2019 8:06 am

I doubt something like that is planned at the moment. But in a new game that might be possible as a special map (in the original game creating a map with something like that wasn't possible)

BlackDouglasOK
Posts: 53

Re: Factions

Post by BlackDouglasOK » Tue May 21, 2019 5:12 pm

I am not a fan of adding and separating factions, it is also very difficult to balance for not saying more work creating models and animations..
I understand why people want to separate Gondor and Rohan, since we spent a lot of time with them in the movies, but both are Men of the West and Rohan as an army only had the Éored, every man in Rohan was a good rider and the "infantry" of the movies was because you can not bring your horse to a wall.
Elves can be divided into High Elves (Rivendell and Lindon) and Gray Elves (Mirkwood and Lorien), but both would be the same: badass archers.
The fact that Mordor is made up of several nations (Rhun, Khand, Harad, Umbar and Mordor) is part of different styles of play for a single faction and shows how powerful Sauron was.
Men of the West has the Rohirric style of cavalry or the Gondorian style of infantry.
The elves have the disciplined style of the High Elves or the guerrilla style of the Gray Elves.
Mordor has the style of orc / troll spam or the elite troop style of corrupt men.
t is not only competitiveness, it is making 6 very different factions among themselves and with different styles of play.
Hell, I would even support the idea of merging Angmar with the Goblins to have 3v3. It is also not fair to get angry and demand more from this team.

Post Reply